Page 11 of 38
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:49 pm
by anarky
Spider-Man's teaching at the X-Men's school.
Spider-Man.
The guy famously called "The Non-Mutant Superhero" for years.
Maybe it seems a little different if you're actually invested in the books, but it really seems like the movie universe is what Ultimate should've been, and the actual 616 comics are just them saying, "What completely off-the-wall stunt can we pull for six months until we change everything up again?"
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:54 pm
by Tom Foolery
There's a little bit to it though. Peter and Logan have become unlikely friends over the past decade since New Avengers started. It's never felt stunt-y. So, Logan asking Pete for this doesn't seem wrong.
Wolverine dying is the stunt. But the fallout is where the interesting stories get told.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:14 pm
by jjreason
I'm considering putting all of my Spider-Man books newer than the end of volume 1 up for sale. I never read much of the Byrne relaunch series, but did read for a few years there with JMS and well into Dan Slott. It's just very far removed from what Spider-Man's life is like in my mind.
The counterpoint to that would be Uncanny X-Men - it's come full circle and is once again near the top of my "to read" pile for the last 3 months - and it wasn't that long ago I was done with X-Men for good. Not 100 percent on selling the Spidey just yet.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:44 pm
by Diabolical
I'm not so sure about this new direction Marvel is heading...
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 9:09 am
by anarky
You did read Brian Cronin's recent post about that panel, right?
http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.co ... led-487/3/
(I actually think it's funnier if you did and are using it anyway because fuck reality.)
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:12 pm
by Diabolical
Ha, no I didn't see that. I kind of assumed something like that was too good to be true, but it was still funny.
I think someone was trying to one-up the classic Joker pulling a boner panels.
Now that I know it's bullshit, if you you close you can see some obvious signs of photoshop in the "dick" area. And the spacing seems off.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:34 pm
by Diabolical
Marvel is adapting The Avengers movie into a two-part comic in December for some reason.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:57 pm
by anarky
The first one? Strike while the iron is hot?
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:27 am
by Diabolical
Yep, the first one. Nothing quite like squeezing 2 1/2 hours of movie into 2 issues 2 1/2 years later.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:22 pm
by Diabolical
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:40 pm
by jjreason
It's Hickman, so it's going to be worth following if the past is any indication. That being said, I'm always a bit more than skeptical when it comes to "everything old is new again" in popular media.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 7:33 pm
by Diabolical
Any idea what's up with Marvel teasing the return of a bunch of past events like Civil War, Planet Hulk, Secret Wars, Days (/Years) of Future Past, Armor Wars, etc.?
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:25 pm
by anarky
A lot of speculation that it's leading to a reboot, but nothing otherwise.
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:47 am
by jjreason
I'm guessing it's all part & parcel with Hickman's 8 months thing (which to be honest was a bit tough to understand during the first issue of Avengers - I read it hoping the summary of events in the next one would clarify a few things ><).
Re: The current state of disarray at Marvel
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:03 pm
by Tom Foolery
jjreason wrote:I'm guessing it's all part & parcel with Hickman's 8 months thing (which to be honest was a bit tough to understand during the first issue of Avengers - I read it hoping the summary of events in the next one would clarify a few things ><).
I concur. This is all part of Hickman's Secret Wars Event next summer.
It's basically the 616 vs What If..? as Marvel weeds down its multiverse.