Page 1 of 1

Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 3:35 pm
by anarky
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/10mosth ... urate.html

:roll:

Okay, I have no real problems with listing Gladiator, Braveheart, The Patriot, and Elizabeth: The Golden Age for the reasons they presented. They are supposed to be about real historical figures, and take some liberties. The three I've seen are some damned good movies, though.

Apocalypto I've not seen. I'm a little iffier on this, as Mayan culture is dead, and there's a lot of speculation involved. There also seems to be a real hatred for Mel Gibson here for some reason. Surprised they didn't put Passion of the Christ on the list.

2001. Ha ha. Cute. No one ever thought of that before. Have you heard the one about the chicken crossing the road?

10,000 BC and 300: What the fuck? Did anyone go to see either of these expecting a history lesson? Fucktards.

Memoirs of a Geisha: They listed this for two incredibly minor reasons. Aside from these two ridiculously insignificant details, it's pretty accurate. Not a history lesson, but not too far away from it. Also, it sticks really closely to the book, which was meticulously researched, so I'm guessing their details on the mizuage could've been possible in some circles. And the dance? Why don't you complain that there weren't Chinese geisha, since the actress was Chinese?

The Last Samurai: Hello. Historical fiction. Meaning this didn't really happen. It could feasibly have happened, though. As opposed to history, which is verified fact. Why don't we bitch and moan about Saving Private Ryan, since he didn't exist, either? The details are totally made up, but a great deal of it definitely falls under "could've been."

Why not bitch about Pearl Harbor, where FDR decides to stand up despite this being a known impossibility in his case?

I can come up with bazillions. Like the US Navy never fired on New York City, as shown in Gangs of New York. Or Birdman of Alcatraz; the dude didn't fucking raise birds in Alcatraz, and he was hardly a nice old man.

It doesn't so much bug me that people make lists like this as it does that they get paid to come up with lists like this.

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:48 pm
by Newsbot

Code: Select all

Bastard!  I was going to post this story. 

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:09 pm
by Double_G
From the ones I have seen on that list, I've enjoyed all of them (Braveheart, Gladiator, The Patriot, 300, Apocalypto). Historical inaccuracies be damned.

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:19 pm
by Ran
JFK probably has more inaccuracies that all of those movies. Obviously whoever made this list hates Mel Gibson and loves Oliver Stone.

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:30 am
by Sleazer
Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace because midichlorians never really existed.

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:42 am
by kidhuman
History of the World Part 1

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:46 pm
by vynsane
Sleazer wrote:Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace because midichlorians never really existed.
for that matter, all the star wars movies, because they supposedly happened long long ago, but we know there wasn't technology like that before we invented it! :x

Re: Another dumb list: 10 Most Historically Inaccurate Movies

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:16 am
by Sleazer
Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace because it is clearly established history that Obi-Wan discovered Anakin (see the unflinchingly uninterpretable "when I first knew him" dialogue).

If you believe otherwise, you are a homosexual Lucasite. And clearly a failure in the study of History. :thumbsup: :yeaha: :thumbsup: