Page 1 of 2

HI!

Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 5:06 pm
by Deadpool
The name's deadpool. You may know me from such great movies and comics as deadpool and deadpool in x men origins wolverine. DISCUSS!

Re: HI!

Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 5:31 pm
by Ran
I haven't seen any of your movies or read any of your comic books, but I did see you in a Marvel video game once. The wikipedia page about you infers you are a rip-off of other comic characters. Any truth to that? It also says you had a girlfriend named "Copycat". Is that just a coinscidence?

Re: HI!

Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 8:26 pm
by vynsane
also: you're liefeld's thought-baby.

Re: HI!

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 8:29 am
by anarky
That's it. I can deal with Liefeld, Condoleeza Rice, peaches, Snigtad, and all the rest, but this is where I draw the line!

Re: HI!

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 12:49 pm
by Snigtad's pecker
anarky wrote:That's it. I can deal with Liefeld, Condoleeza Rice, peaches, Snigtad, and all the rest, but this is where I draw the line!
Hear, Hear! Right-o, old chap!

Re: HI!

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 5:15 pm
by Deadpool
actually, yes i am therefore iam(referring to rob liefeld)

So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:26 am
by anarky
I'm still not reading anything from Marvel after the slew of clusterfucks they've thrown out. But I try to keep somewhat apprised on what's going down overall, and it looks like Deadpool has far surpassed 1990s Wolverine in terms of guest starring pointlessly. (Wolverine is back at the level he was at in the 1990s. Deadpool's gone apeshit beyond that.)

He even looks like he has a starring role in World War Hulks, which I'm sure will be a bunch of Hulks beating each other up, maybe with one dying in the end, or some other bullshit I can read about online.

Seems kinda funny, since it was ten years ago they changed both his name and Cable's and put them in suits so they didn't have to pay Liefeld any royalties. Aside from Cable, whom I consider a Simonson creation that Liefeld just worked on (which makes sense, with him being fairly cool, and everything else Liefeld "created" being shit), I cannot like any Liefeld creation.

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:43 pm
by Zaphod
unlimitedpudding doesn't think he's overexposed. he has quite the collection of deadpool porn, all of which he paid rob liefeld in blowjobs for.

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:13 pm
by anarky
Eww. Just eww. On multiple levels, eww.

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:16 pm
by Rob Liefeld
It wasn't porn. Those were tastefully done, artistic nudes. And I wasn't blowing unlimitedpudding. He had a zit on his dick that he asked me to pop, and sucking the pus out seemed like the most efficient way to do so.

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:44 am
by Ran
Today's poll of the day at Gamefaqs.com: Which new Marvel character would you most like to see in Marvel vs. Capcom 3?

http://www.gamefaqs.com/poll/index.html?poll=3888

Re: HI!

Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:40 pm
by Rollo Tomassi
You're bright yellow text is annoying.

And you are a Deathstroke: the Terminator rip-off.

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:43 pm
by Tom Foolery
The next Deadpool Annual is bringing Brute Force back. And the writer isn't treating them as a punch line. He says they're like the A-Team of bio-engineered animals.
For some reason, that sounds like something anarky would do if he were writing a Marvel comic. :lol:

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:31 pm
by anarky
They've been cribbing our site again. :D

Re: So, is Deadpool overexposed yet?

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 12:04 am
by Tom Foolery
Deadpool has a movie coming out.

And Marvel likes to troll anti-DP fans because he is now the most popular hero in the Marvel Universe and his merchandising is what funds the Avengers now. Yup. Not Tony Stark. Wade Wilson is the $$ behind the Avengers. And Steve Rogers trusts him implicitly.
If that's not a publisher meta-trolling its fan base, I don't know what is.